Free Speech Mother Fucker(In A Nice Way)

I’m confused. If Islam is a religion of peace then one shouldn’t have to worry about one’s security for simply criticizing the doctrine of Islam and the interpretations of that doctrine by it’s adherents. So why isn’t this the case? Ayana Hirsi Ali canceled her trip to Australia because of security concerns. 
It seems we’re not even at the point of being able to openingly critic ideas one finds abhorrent. If we support free speech should we support one’s right to speak out about how they see Islam, meaning it’s doctrine, and how they see some of it’s adherents interpreting it’s doctrine which can lead to behaviors? Negative behaviors that impact others? Like banning gay marriage? Or not allowing women to drive? Or work? Or go anywhere without a guardian?
It baffles me. I see many liberals, progressives and lefties openly criticize Christianity but when it comes to Islam they take it off the table. Are they proponents of free speech?
Do they have to couch what they say about Christians with statements like, “Not all Christians…” when they talk about Senators who use Christian doctrine to justify denying women reproductive rights? I’m not seeing that. Or when Westboro Baptist Church uses Christian doctrine to say things like, “God hates fags” when we can draw a direct line from that belief to the doctrine of Christianity? 
It seems many liberals are able to distinguish different interpretations of Christianity from one another but when it comes to Islam they lump all Muslims together as a monolith who interpret the Quran and Hadith in the same way. 
Similar to the Old Testament we can draw direct lines between beliefs and behavior in the Quran as well. Allah condemns non believers ad nauseam. He commands its adherents to kill them. Many Muslims ignore these commands, thankfully. I applaud them. 
The vast majority of Christians are able to ignore many of the horrific commands by Bible God. Bible God commands adherents to kill those who eat shrimp, work on the sabbath, children who curse their parents, those who wear mixed fabrics and people who may claim other gods are the one true god. 
How are Christians able to ignore these verses? Why aren’t we seeing Christians killing those who work on the sabbath? How are they able to ignore the more toxic ideas in their holy book? 
They’re able to do this because the work of those who spoke out against those bad ideas over the centuries and forced Christianity to capitulate. To capitulate to the values of modernity. Christianity slammed up against reasoning and science and had to reconcile with it or vanish. It reformed itself. Not internally but externally. That’s what I see Ayaan doing. Criticizing a bad idea, attempting to force it into the modern world.
But more importantly, do I not have the right to criticize how I see the Bible? Do I have the right to condemn those bad ideas in the Bible? Can I say the God of the Bible is an abhorrent monster? I find him disgusting. Can I not say that? According to the Bible I can’t. Adherents should kill me for doing so. But they don’t. Why not?
That’s what we’re talking about with Ayaan. She’s simply speaking out about how she see’s things. But let me grant you that she’s a bigot. Are we saying bigots don’t have the right to express their bigoted ideas and expect to feel safe? 
Cuz that’s what I’m hearing. 
When you take ideas off the table for criticism or mockery, expect to have your ideas taken off the table. Ideas that are not offensive don’t need free speech protection. It’s the one’s we find offensive that do.